Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB) – Safe, Natural, or Harmful??


Could your “natural” shampoo, conditioner, facial cleanser, body wash, baby shampoo, or bubble bath have toxic ingredients? If you suffer from eczema or dry, irritated eyes, check out this information about a common ingredient in “natural” and “organic” labeled products.

Ever see the words “coconut-based cleanser” on your skin care labels?  Sounds so natural and innocuous, doesn’t it?  It’s actually Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB).  It is used as a surfactant, thickener, and/or foaming agent in shampoos, bubble baths and the like.  It’s also used in conditioners because it creates anti-static properties.  You’ll find this chemical in many of “SLS-free” products or “tear-free” baby products.  CAPB is not supposed to irritate mucous membranes or cause skin irritation like a stronger detergent would.  The unfortunate truth is, it still does.

CAPB is frequently found to be contaminated with dimethylaminopropylamine, amidoamine, or sodium monochloroacetate. The -amine  group of chemicals can react with other substances in your products to form another dangerous class of chemicals called nitrosamines, most of which are carcinogenic.

CAPB is a common trigger for eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, and contact dermatitis.  If you suffer from “allergy eyes” and don’t have any underlying sinus symptoms, CAPB may be your culprit.  We became acutely aware of the possible side effects of CAPB when a family member of one of our staff began to experience severe eye irritations.  Their eyes were chronically dry, irritated, and tended to “crust” during sleep.  They also developed very dry, painful cracks at the outer corners of their eyes, despite near constant application of moisturizer to the area.  They were diagnosed with blepharitis and told to wash their eyes with baby shampoo.  Guess what baby shampoo contains?  That’s right, cocamidopropyl betaine.  It wasn’t until they eliminated ALL products containing CAPB that they began to experience some relief.

Another disheartening discovery we made was that nearly every one of the eyelid cleansers or scrubs recommended for patients with eye problems also contained CAPB.  Most contained CAPB along with Sodium Lauryl Sulfate and plenty of parabens.

For people experiencing painful dryness, cracking, and irritation of their ocular area, these chemicals are only compounding the problem.  No wonder they aren’t receiving any relief.  This is why we developed a gentle, non-toxic foaming eyelid wash.  It removes the sticky build-up of dust and oily debris without stripping the protective layer of the skin and without contributing to further irritation.  You can find it here.

CAPB is well documented as a contact allergen and primary contributor to head, neck, scalp, and facial dermatitis.  If you are experiencing dermatitis, allergic breakouts, or eczema or psoriasis-like symptoms in these regions, it would be well worth your time to critically examine all personal care products you are currently using and to remove all that contain CAPB or other harsh surfactants.

Consider how products containing this chemical are commonly used: cleansing lotions, contact lens cleaning solutions, creams, deodorants, hair coloring kits, shampoo and conditioners, eye make-up removers, baby wipes, shaving gels, hair styling products and toothpastes.  Think about how shampoos, eye cleansers, and body washes run into your eyes, nose, and ears as they are used.  It’s not hard to understand how this can constantly irritate sensitive mucous membranes and skin.  It can be tricky to get rid of everything with CAPB in it, but it is well worth the effort to get relief from eye or skin allergies and irritation.

Just because this chemical was once derived from coconuts (many processing levels ago) doesn’t make it a safe or natural ingredient.  You may also find variants of this chemical listed as: Tegobetaine L7, Cocoyl amide propyldimethyl glycine, coconut oil amidopropyl betaine, N-cocamidopropyl-N, N-dimethlglycine hydroxide inner salt.



Face Naturals

5 thoughts on “Cocamidopropyl Betaine (CAPB) – Safe, Natural, or Harmful??

  1. Ruth says:

    My daughter is allergic to natural coconut. No wonder she has always has hives, headaches, upset stomachs.and the doctors are having a hard time pin pointing exactly what is causing it, besides me always trying new soaps and shampoos for her.

    I never thought of coconut being secretly put into all kinds of the soaps, laundry soaps, and cleaners we use under a scientific form like Cocamidoprpyl betaine.

    Worse yet when this chemical is mixed with others it is a carcinogenic. Im glad I decided to do research on the chemicals in our soaps and reading up on the negative effects COCAMIDOPRPYL BETAINE has on the human body as well as to the environment, it makes me extremely mad.

    I don’t care how big a company is. They should get their pants sued off of them for all medical bills people endure because of their products and so should the FDA get sued for siding with the big companies, weather it is a drug producing company, soap, cleaner, etc. type companies.. STOP USING HUMANS AS SCIENCE EXPERIMENTS and as their personal Guinnie Pigs. They can use it on their own families and loved ones not ours.

  2. Rosie says:

    I think we all pretty much have some kind of allergies. Everyone’s body reacts differently to organically/nonorganically products. I am sorry to hear here and there people get reaction to this and that product. I have in my family too. But that is not the producers faults or even the FDA. It is our job to protect ourself. It goes thru trials and errors the same with producers when they test their products. They can’t know if we are allergic to what to prevent for us. So we can’t blame them. Unless they use something that proven to be dangerous. Otherwise, if only one or two people have reaction to something in their products, they wouldn’t know.

    • Sara says:

      Yes, but wouldn’t it be nice if instead of rushing to use yet another cheap, safe-until-otherwise-proven ingredient, if they had to prove its non-toxicity FIRST? Obviously, there’s no way to make one product for everyone, one that to which no one would have an allergic reaction, because as you say, people can have allergic reactions to toxic AND non-toxic material. but I think the issue here is – why not start with ALL, proven, non-toxic materials as the standard? Unfortunately that doesn’t coincide with the greedy, corporate atmosphere of today’s world. So it is wishful thinking, sad to say. (Although I do have a hope that there will be a turning of the tide, and soon. Mt 6:10)

  3. Lara says:

    I love reading through a post that can make people
    think. Also, I love face naturals and thank you for allowing for me to comment!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *